FLK2 · SQE1 module

Trusts

Trusts is a currently under-served subject online, which does not make it easier: the three certainties and trustee duties are tested with precision.

A trust that fails one of the three certainties does not simply become "less effective". It fails entirely or takes effect differently, and questions test which outcome follows.

What this module covers

Every topic in Trusts, in the order the course teaches them. This is the whole syllabus for the module, not a selection.

  1. The Three Certainties
  2. The Beneficiary Principle
  3. Formalities for Creation
  4. Trust Constitution: Exceptions to 'Equity Will Not Assist a Volunteer'
  5. Beneficial Interests and Saunders v Vautier
  6. Rules Against Perpetuity
  7. Types of Trust (Classification)
  8. Resulting Trusts
  9. Trusts of the Family Home
  10. Charitable Trusts
  11. Non-Charitable Purpose Trusts
  12. Appointment, Retirement and Removal of Trustees
  13. Fiduciary Obligations of Trustees
  14. Trustees' Duties and Powers (Administration and Investment)
  15. Control of Trustees by Beneficiaries
  16. Breach of Trust: Liability and Trustee Protections
  17. Tracing in Equity (Proprietary Claims)
  18. Liability of Strangers to the Trust
  19. Secret and Half-Secret Trusts
  20. Nature of Equitable Remedies

A real question from this module

Answer it before you decide

FLK2 · Trusts

Question

A will states: "It is my wish that my trustees allow my son to benefit from my collection of paintings as they see fit, and my daughter is to receive the remainder of my estate." Which certainty is most clearly missing in relation to the gift to the son?

Choose the best answer

Answer A

Precatory words, expressions of hope or wish rather than obligation such as "it is my wish", point to a failure of certainty of intention: the settlor has not shown a binding intention to impose a trust rather than a moral request. Wide trustee discretion is not itself a problem, since discretionary trusts are valid, so the fourth option misdiagnoses the defect. The paintings and the residue are each sufficiently identified as assets, so subject matter is not what fails here, and nothing on the facts casts genuine doubt on the son’s identity.

Knight v Knight (1840) 3 Beav 148, and Re Adams and the Kensington Vestry (1884) 27 Ch D 394 (precatory words).

Pick another option to compare, or try five more free questions.