FLK2 · SQE1 module

Trusts

Trusts is a currently under-served subject online, which does not make it easier: the three certainties and trustee duties are tested with precision.

A trust that fails one of the three certainties does not simply become "less effective". It fails entirely or takes effect differently, and questions test which outcome follows.

What this module covers

Every section of Trusts, in the order the course teaches them. This is the whole syllabus for the module, not a selection. Open a section to read the topics inside it.

  1. The Three Certainties10 topics
    • The three certainties in outline
    • Certainty of intention
    • Certainty of subject matter
    • Certainty of objects in a fixed trust
    • Certainty of objects in a discretionary trust
    • What happens if objects are uncertain
    • Trust property must already exist
    • Certainty of each beneficiary’s share
    • Communication to beneficiaries is not needed
    • The timing limbs of intention
  2. The Beneficiary Principle1 topic
    • Ascertainable beneficiaries who can enforce
  3. Formalities for Creation5 topics
    • The general rule: no formalities
    • Declarations of trust over land
    • Disposing of a subsisting equitable interest
    • Resulting, implied and constructive trusts excepted
    • Testamentary trusts and the Wills Act 1837
  4. Trust Constitution: Exceptions to 'Equity Will Not Assist a Volunteer'8 topics
    • The two ways to create a trust
    • Equity will not perfect an imperfect gift
    • The every effort principle in Re Rose
    • Donatio mortis causa
    • The rule in Strong v Bird
    • Proprietary estoppel
    • Unconscionability in Pennington v Waine
    • A gift to a body of trustees
  5. Beneficial Interests and Saunders v Vautier4 topics
    • Fixed and discretionary trusts
    • Vested and contingent interests
    • The rule in Saunders v Vautier
    • A single fixed-interest beneficiary
  6. Rules Against Perpetuity3 topics
    • Remoteness of vesting
    • Inalienability
    • Accumulation of income
  7. Types of Trust (Classification)2 topics
    • How trusts are classified
    • Protective trusts
  8. Resulting Trusts7 topics
    • What a resulting trust does
    • Presumed resulting trusts
    • Rebutting the presumption
    • Automatic resulting trusts
    • Quistclose trusts
    • Transfers for an illegal purpose
    • Evidence admissible in rebuttal
  9. Trusts of the Family Home5 topics
    • Joint names with no declaration
    • An express declaration of shares
    • The common intention constructive trust
    • Proprietary estoppel as an alternative
    • Varying an agreed share by conduct
  10. Charitable Trusts6 topics
    • The three requirements
    • The thirteen charitable purposes
    • Public benefit
    • Exclusively charitable purposes
    • The cy-près doctrine
    • How specific plans affect cy-près
  11. Non-Charitable Purpose Trusts3 topics
    • The anomalous honorary purpose trusts
    • Trusts to promote hunting
    • Denley trusts
  12. Appointment, Retirement and Removal of Trustees11 topics
    • Who may appoint new trustees
    • The number of trustees
    • Retirement of a trustee
    • Beneficiaries directing appointment
    • A trust does not fail for want of a trustee
    • The court’s power to appoint
    • Capacity to be a trustee
    • Practical guidance on numbers
    • Acceptance and disclaimer of office
    • Appointing additional trustees
    • Who joins in appointing a replacement
  13. Fiduciary Obligations of Trustees5 topics
    • The no-conflict rule
    • The no-profit rule
    • No self-dealing
    • Remuneration
    • The duty of confidentiality
  14. Trustees' Duties and Powers (Administration and Investment)18 topics
    • The statutory duty of care
    • The general power of investment
    • The standard investment criteria
    • The duty to obtain advice
    • Delegation to agents
    • The power of maintenance
    • The power of advancement
    • The duty to act impartially
    • The duty to get in trust property
    • The duty to observe the terms of the trust
    • The power to insure
    • Trustees must act unanimously
    • Accounts, records and their production
    • Keeping trust property separate
    • What counts as an investment
    • Where maintenance accumulations go at 18
    • Payment mechanics for a minor
    • The written consent proviso on advancement
  15. Control of Trustees by Beneficiaries2 topics
    • Compelling performance and challenging discretion
    • Legitimate expectation from a settled practice
  16. Breach of Trust: Liability and Trustee Protections3 topics
    • What amounts to a breach
    • Joint and several liability
    • Defences, consent and limitation
  17. Tracing in Equity (Proprietary Claims)5 topics
    • Why a proprietary claim is advantageous
    • The rule in Re Hallett’s Estate
    • The rule in Re Oatway
    • The lowest intermediate balance rule
    • Assets bought with mixed funds
  18. Liability of Strangers to the Trust5 topics
    • The bona fide purchaser
    • The innocent volunteer
    • Knowing receipt
    • Dishonest assistance
    • What counts as assistance
  19. Secret and Half-Secret Trusts1 topic
    • Fully secret and half-secret trusts
  20. Nature of Equitable Remedies1 topic
    • When equity supplements the common law

A real question from this module

Answer it before you decide

FLK2 · Trusts

Question

A will states: "It is my wish that my trustees allow my son to benefit from my collection of paintings as they see fit, and my daughter is to receive the remainder of my estate." Which certainty is most clearly missing in relation to the gift to the son?

Choose the best answer

Answer A

Precatory words, expressions of hope or wish rather than obligation such as "it is my wish", point to a failure of certainty of intention: the settlor has not shown a binding intention to impose a trust rather than a moral request. Wide trustee discretion is not itself a problem, since discretionary trusts are valid, so the fourth option misdiagnoses the defect. The paintings and the residue are each sufficiently identified as assets, so subject matter is not what fails here, and nothing on the facts casts genuine doubt on the son’s identity.

Knight v Knight (1840) 3 Beav 148, and Re Adams and the Kensington Vestry (1884) 27 Ch D 394 (precatory words).

Pick another option to compare, or try five more free questions.

Ask usAI